Industry guide
Sell property management data to AI: what buyers want from residential, commercial and association managers
On this page
The short answer
Yes, you can sell property management data to AI companies, as a license to a de-identified copy of your records. Several buyers name the category: one large AI training-data company lists Property Management, and one broker names work orders, leasing and renewals, owner reporting, rent collection, vendor management and SOPs (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory). Each figure on this page is a program's own advertised term; our buyer directory lists the programs and links to their published terms.
Property management data licensing works best for third-party residential and commercial managers with about 20+ desk staff and 5+ years on AppFolio, Yardi or Rent Manager. Tenant and owner identities, screening reports, MLS data and HOA association records stay out. The catch is ownership: some platforms and many management agreements give the property owner the records, so you scope around that first.
Why AI companies want property manager records
AI labs are training agents to do office work, and they need real examples of decisions with results attached. A management company produces those all day. A resident reports a leak through the portal. A maintenance coordinator triages it, picks a vendor, approves a cost under the owner's limit, and closes the ticket, or reopens it when the leak comes back. A leasing agent answers an inquiry, books a showing, processes an application and signs a lease, or does not. An accountant writes the owner a note explaining why the month came in under budget.
Three things make property manager records stand out to buyers:
- The outcomes are built in. A ticket is resolved or reopened. A lease renews or the unit turns. Rent is paid on a plan or the case goes to court. A prospect signs or goes elsewhere. One buyer program asks for records that show outcomes, such as won or lost and resolved or escalated (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory).
- The volume is high. By our estimate, a firm managing a few thousand doors writes thousands of work orders and leasing conversations a year, each with notes, photos and costs. That is enough repetition for a model to learn the judgment behind it.
- The systems link. AppFolio, Yardi Breeze, Rent Manager and Buildium tie the request, vendor, invoice, owner approval and resident communication to one property and one unit. A separate maintenance layer such as Property Meld or an inspection app such as HappyCo adds more linked records.
Buyers say so in their own words. One marketplace lists “property management tickets” and names AppFolio, Buildium, Yardi and Rent Manager among the systems it takes. Another buyer program asks for “Listings, leases, inspection reports” under real estate, and a third lists field records such as work orders, inspection notes and dispatch logs (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory). The industry is also curious: Buildium's 2027 industry report says 83% of property management companies are already using AI, planning to adopt it, or actively investigating it (source: Buildium, 2027 Property Management Industry Report). Our property management records overview puts the records and the buyers on one page.
AI buyers that name property management and real estate
These are the programs in our registry whose own pages name property management, real estate or property services, shown by type. Each cell is the program's own published term; our buyer directory lists the programs and links to where each says so.
| Program | What it names | Who qualifies | Advertised pay |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buyer program B | Real estate | No headcount, years or geography published. Companies check eligibility through a qualification form. | No range published. Price is based on data volume, the number of tools connected, and depth. No upfront costs, setup fees or deductions. |
| Marketplace A | Real estate | "Any business, in any industry, with a few years of records." No hard minimum on size or history; longer history is valued more. Sellers must show they own the data and can license it. | "$250K+ Typical company deal," with larger archives "reaching the millions." The release describes payouts of "many times" six figures for some companies. |
| Broker B | Property management | About 30+ employees, several years of history, English. US, UK and Canada first. | "Get up to $4M." A fixed sum is agreed before any data is shared. |
| Buyer program H | Property management | "40+ employees" is its "preferred starting point," assessed case by case. It asks for years of records. No geography is stated. | "$10K to $1M+" as an "illustrative value per data partnership, scaling with cadence." It says its partnerships are designed so there is opportunity for recurring revenue. |
| Buyer program L | Real estate | Companies headquartered and operating in the United States only. No size minimum published. Data held on behalf of your own clients is out of scope unless you have the right to license it. | No range published. Every record is priced individually after the program reads a de-identified sample. |
| Broker D | Real estate and property services | Its estimate form accepts 20 to 5,000 full-time employees and 3 to 100 years in operation, with regions of US, Canada, Australia, Europe and other. "Data from any industry may qualify." | "Your company's operational data could be worth $50k-$4M+." It says the company keeps ownership of the underlying data and is paid for each licensing deal done with an AI lab. |
A few notes on reading the table. Buyer program H names “Property Management” word for word, calls 40+ employees its preferred starting point, and says it anonymizes records inside your environment before any data is extracted. Broker B names the exact workflows (work orders, leasing and renewals, owner reporting, rent collection, vendor management and SOPs), says tenant and owner personal data is stripped, and never licenses proprietary pricing logic. Marketplace A lists property management tickets and the four systems most managers run (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory).
The rest name real estate more broadly. Buyer program B lists listings, leases and inspection reports. Buyer program L buys from US companies only and says data held on behalf of your own clients is out of scope unless you have the right to license it, which matters for a manager whose clients are property owners. Buyer program E, which pays some of the highest advertised figures, does not name property managers in any tier and requires that the company own the records in its systems (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory). Our directory of buyer programs has every program we track.
What property management records AI buyers value
The pattern across buyers is simple: they want what your people wrote, decided and resolved. What identifies a tenant or owner, and what a vendor or an MLS compiled, usually stays out. Here is how that maps to a management company.
| Record type | Where it usually lives | Why buyers value it | Usual status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Work orders and maintenance requests (triage, vendor, cost, completion) | AppFolio, Yardi Breeze, Rent Manager, Buildium, Propertyware, Rentvine; Property Meld or Latchel | Request, decision, vendor, cost, time and outcome in one record | Qualifies after tenant details come out, subject to platform and owner terms |
| Leasing pipeline: inquiries, showings, applications, conversion | AppFolio leasing tools, Yardi RENTCafe, ShowMojo, Rently | High-volume conversations from first question to signed lease | Qualifies with prospect identities and fair-housing-sensitive fields removed |
| Executed leases, renewals and commercial lease abstracts | Property management system, DocuSign, Yardi Voyager | Renewal history with offer, counter and outcome; structured clause data | Often the owner's records; scoped agreement by agreement |
| Move-in and move-out inspections, photos, deposit dispositions | HappyCo, zInspector, RentCheck, attachments in the core system | Before-and-after photos with itemized charges and dispute outcomes | Qualifies with faces, mail and house numbers masked; app terms vary |
| Rent collection, delinquency and payment-plan notes | Ledger notes in the core system, payment-plan agreements | When to offer a plan or file, with paid or vacated outcomes | Qualifies after identities come out; eviction records reviewed by state |
| Resident and owner communications | Portal messages, email, SMS, after-hours call lines | Years of service conversations with the resolution visible | Heaviest personal-data load; call recordings need consent review |
| Owner statements, variance notes, budgets, CAM reconciliations | Owner portals, Yardi Voyager, MRI, Excel | Monthly narratives that explain the numbers | Often the owner's books under the management agreement |
| Turn schedules and make-ready | Core system, HappyCo, Smartsheet, spreadsheets | Scheduling under constraints with days-vacant outcomes | Low personal data; usually qualifies |
| SOPs, training manuals, checklists, written screening criteria | Google Drive, SharePoint, Trainual, Notion, Process Street | Clean, firm-authored process knowledge | The firm's own work; the clearest part of the file |
| New-business pipeline: owner proposals, rental analyses, wins and losses | HubSpot, LeadSimple, Salesforce | Pricing proposals with won or lost outcomes | Qualifies with prospect owner details removed |
| Internal chat and staff email; the firm's own accounting | Slack, Teams, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, QuickBooks | Coordination, escalation and the firm's own cost structure | Qualifies after names come out |
The test that sorts most property management records
Did someone at your company write it, decide it or photograph it as part of running the firm? Then it is usually the kind of record buyers want, once tenant and owner details come out. Is it the owner's books, the association's official records, a consumer report, or data an MLS or vendor compiled? Then it usually stays out, or needs someone else's written consent first.
Residential, commercial and HOA managers: how the segments differ
Buyers that name property management do not split the category, but the records and the rights do. In our view the segments rank roughly in this order for a data license.
- Third-party residential managers of single-family homes and small multifamily, on AppFolio, Yardi Breeze or Rent Manager. Many owner clients, high work-order and leasing volume, and platform terms that let the firm keep its data. This is the strongest segment.
- Commercial managers of office, retail and light industrial, often on Yardi Voyager or MRI. Fewer, larger owner clients, so each management agreement carries more weight. Lease abstracts, CAM reconciliations and tenant service tickets are valuable, but they are more often the owner's records, and owner consent matters more.
- Buildium shops. Buildium's terms make the property owner the owner of everything entered for that property (source: Buildium Terms of Use (updated Oct 5, 2026)), so a license needs owner consent or has to rest on the firm's own SOPs, training and internal records.
- Community association managers. The weakest fit. In Florida, association records and the data in association software are the association's official records (source: Florida Statutes 720.303, association records), and California bars commercial use of association records (source: California Civil Code 5230). Vantaca, a common HOA platform, bans training AI on its services or data derived from them (source: Vantaca Terms of Service (July 2026)). The manager's own process documents are the realistic scope.
If your company also develops and builds the communities it manages, the multifamily developer guide covers that profile, including Yardi Voyager, Entrata and ResMan terms. Franchise offices are a separate case: where the franchisor controls the systems, its consent usually comes first.
Who qualifies for property management data licensing
Headcount and history gates decide which buyers will look at your firm. Here are the published gates for the programs that matter most to a management company.
| Program | Size gate | History |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer program H | 40+ employees as a preferred starting point, case by case | Asks for years of records |
| Broker B | About 30+ employees | Several years of history |
| Broker D | 20 to 5,000 full-time employees | 3+ years in operation |
| Buyer program C | 20+ full-time employees | 3+ years in operation |
| Buyer program D | 20+ full-time US W-2 employees | 3+ years in business |
| Buyer program E | 20+ full-time US office employees; only office staff count; must own the records | 3+ years of records and 5+ systems |
| Marketplace A, Buyer program L | No minimum published; Buyer program L buys from US companies only | Longer history valued more |
Desk staff, not doors
Buyers count people, not units. A firm that outsources maintenance is mostly desk staff: property managers, leasing agents, maintenance coordinators, accountants and owner relations. A firm with in-house technicians, porters and grounds crews can have 60 employees and only 25 at a desk. For the program that counts only office staff, that difference decides eligibility.
Years on one system
In our view the strongest candidates have 10+ years in business and 5+ years on their current property management system. History usually breaks at software migrations. Buildium says it will not transfer historical data for a property to a new manager without the former owner's written permission (§4.d), and is not required to keep data after termination (§10.e) (source: Buildium Terms of Use (updated Oct 5, 2026)). Yardi Breeze deletes all data 45 days after the final term ends (§5(a)) (source: Yardi Breeze Terms of Use (June 13, 2025)). If you migrated and kept the old export, that archive can still count.
How many firms fit, for context
Census business counts for 2022 show 2,080 residential property managers (NAICS 531311) with 20 to 49 employees, 788 with 50 to 99 and 852 with 100 to 499. Nonresidential property managers (NAICS 531312) number 850, 323 and 299 in the same bands, about 5,190 firms in all (source: Census, Statistics of US Businesses 2022, detailed sizes). HOA managers sit inside 531311 and cannot be separated. By state, California has 805 such firms, New York 569, Texas 428 and Florida 401, with multi-state firms counted in each state (source: Census, Statistics of US Businesses 2022, state by 6-digit NAICS). NARPM, the residential managers' association, says it represents more than 6,000 members (source: NARPM, About). A 30 to 150 person manager with a decade on one platform is in a fairly small group. The property management company page shows how Regulr reviews a firm of that size.
What buyers advertise paying for property management data
No buyer publishes a price for property management records specifically. What exists are each program's general ranges. The ones that name the category:
- Buyer program H: “$10K to $1M+” as an illustrative value per partnership, scaling with cadence, with partnerships designed for recurring revenue (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory).
- Marketplace A: “$250K+ Typical company deal,” with larger archives described as reaching the millions (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory).
- Broker B: “Get up to $4M,” with a fixed sum agreed before any data is shared (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory).
- Broker D: $50k to $4M+ as its advertised range (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory).
- Buyer program L publishes no range and prices each record after reading a de-identified sample, and Buyer program B prices by volume, tools connected and depth (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory).
Treat estimators with care: several programs' calculators share one formula, so similar numbers from two of them are not independent valuations. What actually moves a management company's price is years on one system, work orders that link to vendor invoices and outcomes, the share of records that belong to owners or associations, and how much has to be excluded. Our data value checker walks through those factors.
Who owns property management records: you, the owner or the association
Ownership is the first question in this category, and it has three layers. A buyer will ask about all three.
- Your software's terms. Buildium says the license to its services “is held by the applicable Owner for each Property” (§2.a), and the owner warrants that it “owns all right, title and interest in and to the Owner Data” (§10.b), which covers data entered by the manager (source: Buildium Terms of Use (updated Oct 5, 2026)). AppFolio, by contrast, says “You will retain all right, title and interest in and to your data” (§1.4) (source: AppFolio Property Manager Core Terms of Service (Jan 30, 2026)), Yardi Breeze says the data “does not belong to Yardi” (§8(a)) (source: Yardi Breeze Terms of Use (June 13, 2025)), and CINC says it does not own any data you submit (§4) (source: CINC Systems Software License and Service Terms (Sept 1, 2025)).
- Your management agreements. Many management agreements say the books and records for a property belong to the owner and must be handed over when the agreement ends. Whether that reaches your work-order history, leasing pipeline and internal notes depends on the wording. Read the books-and-records and termination clauses in each signed agreement before you scope anything.
- State law for associations. Florida makes association records the official records of the association, keeps most of them for at least 7 years, and says data in association software is part of the official records (source: Florida Statutes 720.303, association records). A manager must return them within 20 business days after the contract ends or a written request (source: Florida Statutes 468.4334, return of association records). California says association records “may not be sold, used for a commercial purpose” (5230(a)), and bars an association or its managing agent from selling a member's personal information without consent (5230(c)) (source: California Civil Code 5230).
None of this rules a firm out. It decides the scope. Your SOPs, training, internal chat, the firm's own accounting, new-business pipeline and written policies are the firm's own records in almost every setup. Work orders and leasing records follow your platform and agreements. Owner statements and association records usually need someone else's written consent, or stay out. Our guide to who owns property management records goes through each layer, along with records retention rules.
AppFolio, Buildium and your software: what the terms say about data
Your property management system holds most of the value, so its terms matter as much as the records. The terms we read on October 18, 2026 split into three groups.
- You keep the data, export it yourself. AppFolio says you retain your data (§1.4), will not sell your Business Data (§9.2), and bars robots and scrapers (§5.4(ix)). When you cancel, “you are expected to retrieve your data prior to the termination or expiration” (§6.3) (source: AppFolio Property Manager Core Terms of Service (Jan 30, 2026)). Yardi Breeze lets you “copy, delete, and export this data at any time” (§8(a)) but deletes everything 45 days after the term (§5(a)) (source: Yardi Breeze Terms of Use (June 13, 2025)). CINC offers a CSV export on termination unless it terminates for breach (§4) (source: CINC Systems Software License and Service Terms (Sept 1, 2025)).
- The owner holds the data. Buildium, as above: owner consent first (source: Buildium Terms of Use (updated Oct 5, 2026)).
- The vendor limits AI use. Rentvine bars using any data obtained through its services, “including any outputs, reports, analytics,” to train an AI model without its prior written consent (§4.c(xii)) (source: Rentvine Terms (last modified Oct 14, 2026)). Vantaca bars using “the Services or any data derived therefrom to train artificial intelligence models or machine learning algorithms” (§2.3(j)) (source: Vantaca Terms of Service (July 2026)). HappyCo bars automated access, including to train AI tools, and deletes account data at cancellation (source: HappyCo Terms of Use (Sept 29, 2026)).
Older or quieter terms need a look too. Propertyware's published terms, dated 2018, say user data is permanently deleted on cancellation (§16) (source: Propertyware Terms of Service (Nov 8, 2018)). Rent Manager does not publish its customer license agreement that we could find, so your signed copy governs. AppFolio's Realm-X terms let AppFolio use and retain AI inputs and outputs and share them with third-party partners for training Realm-X (§4.2) (source: AppFolio Value+ Terms, Realm-X (Sept 21, 2026)), which is about what AppFolio does with Realm-X content, not about your own export. Yardi Voyager, Entrata and ResMan are covered in the multifamily guide.
The practical rule: run your own export through each platform's reports while you are still subscribed, and never plan on a scraper, bot or AI agent pulling the data. Our guide to AppFolio, Buildium, Rent Manager and Vantaca data export and AI terms goes clause by clause.
What usually stays out of a property management data license
Most of what stays out falls into five groups.
- Tenant, applicant and owner identity. Names, unit numbers, street addresses, phones, emails, bank details, guarantor information, entry codes and pet or access notes come out or are replaced with consistent tokens. One broker says tenant and owner personal data is stripped before licensing (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory).
- Tenant screening reports. Credit, eviction and criminal reports are consumer reports, which a consumer reporting agency may furnish “under the following circumstances and no other” (source: 15 U.S.C. 1681b, permissible purposes of consumer reports). Buyers do not ask for them, and they stay out entirely.
- Fair-housing-sensitive fields. Protected-class indicators, disability and accommodation details, voucher status and income in leasing records are removed. AppFolio's terms remind customers they are responsible for complying with the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Fair Housing Act when they use its tools (source: AppFolio Property Manager Core Terms of Service (Jan 30, 2026)).
- Data someone else compiled. MLS feeds, listing syndication data and Yardi Matrix data are not yours to license; Yardi Breeze bars transferring “data other than your own data (such as Yardi-compiled Matrix or ILS data)” (§2(b)) (source: Yardi Breeze Terms of Use (June 13, 2025)). Current rent-pricing and occupancy data is a poor fit too; the multifamily guide explains why.
- Association records and the owner's books, where state law or the management agreement gives them to someone else.
None of this empties the dataset. Take out the identities, the consumer reports and other people's data, and what remains (work orders, leasing workflows, inspections, delinquency decisions, turn schedules, SOPs and internal coordination) is the part buyers say they want. You approve the scope, and each exclusion is named in the contract. The records ownership guide lists what stays out in more detail.
If you are selling your property management company
Property management firms change hands often, and roll-ups are active buyers. One national single-family platform advertises 100+ acquisitions and 40k+ doors under management (source: PURE HomeRiver, join page), and Buildium's report says 12% of management companies cite acquiring another firm or portfolio as a growth strategy (source: Buildium, 2027 Property Management Industry Report). If a sale is on your horizon, a data license is one more contract an acquirer will read in diligence. Exclusivity is the term to watch: one buyer program requires 24 months of seller exclusivity, and another's published deals are perpetual exclusive licenses (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory).
Timing matters for a second reason in this category. After a sale or a platform migration, the old system's history can be hard to recover, and some platforms delete it within weeks. Our guide to selling a property management company and licensing the records first covers valuation, deal structure and the questions an acquirer will ask.
How a property management data deal runs, step by step
- Inventory. List your systems (core platform, maintenance layer, inspection app, leasing tools, accounting, email, chat, shared drives), how many years each holds, and roughly how many work orders and leasing inquiries you handle a month. Nothing leaves your systems at this stage.
- Check the rights. Note your platform's ownership and AI clauses, pull your management agreement templates and any signed variations, and flag association clients and their states.
- Scope. Decide what is in and what is out. Screening reports, owner books, association records, MLS data and call audio are the usual exclusions. You approve the scope, and it is written into the contract.
- De-identification. Tenant, applicant, owner and vendor details are masked or replaced with consistent tokens, and faces, mail and house numbers in photos are blurred, so a work order still links end to end without naming anyone.
- Export. Run the export through your platform's own reports or backups while you are subscribed. No buyer bot or scraper touches your system.
- Offers and terms. Buyers review a sample or a description and make an offer. Terms cover price, payment schedule, scope, exclusivity, permitted uses, deletion at the end of the term, and the warranties you give about your rights to the records.
- Delivery and payment. The records go from your systems to the buyer you chose. With Regulr, they never pass through us.
The best position is more than one written offer, because buyers price the same records differently and treat owner-held records differently. That comparison is the work Regulr does for the seller. To see how your firm would come out, start with the property management page and see what your work orders and leasing records could qualify for.
How Regulr is paid, and how we write these pages
Regulr is a sell-side advisor. When a business we introduce signs a license, we may be paid a fee by the buyer or through a program's referral terms. We list every program we can verify whether or not it pays us, order is never set by fees, and every figure is the company's own advertised term with a link to where it says so. Regulr has not closed a data deal yet, so nothing here describes our results.
Frequently asked questions
Can a property management company sell its data to AI companies?
Yes, as a license to a de-identified copy of the records your team created. Several AI training-data companies name property management or real estate on their own pages, and one broker lists work orders, leasing and renewals, owner reporting, rent collection, vendor management and SOPs. Tenant and owner personal data is stripped, screening reports stay out, and you keep your originals.
How much is my property management company's data worth?
No buyer publishes a price for property management records specifically. Programs that name the category advertise broad ranges, such as $10K to $1M+ per partnership at one buyer and $250K+ as a typical company deal at a marketplace. What moves the number is years on one system, work orders that link request to vendor to cost to outcome, and how much has to be excluded. Advertised ranges are not offers.
Who owns the records, my company or the property owners?
It depends on your software terms and your management agreements. Buildium's terms say the property owner owns the Owner Data, while AppFolio, Yardi Breeze and CINC say the customer keeps its data. Many management agreements also say the books and records for a property belong to the owner. Your own SOPs, training and internal process records are usually the clearest part.
Can I license data from AppFolio?
AppFolio's Core Terms say you retain all right, title and interest in and to your data, and AppFolio says it will not sell your Business Data. The same terms bar robots and scrapers, and when you cancel you are expected to retrieve your data before the subscription ends. So the usual route is your own export through AppFolio's reports while you are still subscribed.
Can an HOA management company license its records?
Much less of it. Florida law makes association records, including the data in association software, the official records of the association, and managers must return them within 20 business days after the contract ends. California bars selling association records or using them for a commercial purpose. Vantaca's terms ban training AI on its services or data derived from them. The firm's own SOPs and training material are the part most likely to qualify.
Are tenant screening reports part of a data license?
No. Credit, eviction and criminal background reports are consumer reports under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, which lets them be furnished only for listed permissible purposes. Buyers do not ask for them, and they stay out of scope. Your written screening criteria, as a firm policy document, are a different record and can qualify.
Will my owners or tenants find out I licensed data?
Buyers license records with tenant, applicant, owner and vendor names, unit numbers, addresses, phones and bank details removed or replaced with consistent tokens, so the data is not meant to point back to anyone. That is not a guarantee: a small market or an unusual property can be easier to trace. Agree in writing on what is excluded, that the buyer will not try to re-identify anyone, and whether your company's name stays confidential.
Do maintenance technicians count toward headcount minimums?
It depends on the program. One buyer program counts only office staff, while others ask for 20+ or 40+ full-time employees without excluding field staff. Property managers, leasing agents, maintenance coordinators, accountants and owner relations staff count everywhere. Firms that outsource maintenance usually have a high share of desk staff.
Sources
Vendor terms, the Florida and California statutes, FCRA, the Buildium report, the NARPM count and the PURE HomeRiver page were read on their own pages on October 18, 2026. Program terms were checked on October 15, 2026; our buyer directory lists the programs and links to their published terms. Census counts come from our October 15 category research, computed from the public SUSB 2022 files that day.
- program terms, Regulr buyer directory
- Buildium Terms of Use (updated Oct 5, 2026)
- AppFolio Property Manager Core Terms of Service (Jan 30, 2026)
- AppFolio Value+ Terms, Realm-X (Sept 21, 2026)
- Yardi Breeze Terms of Use (June 13, 2025)
- Rentvine Terms (last modified Oct 14, 2026)
- Vantaca Terms of Service (July 2026)
- CINC Systems Software License and Service Terms (Sept 1, 2025)
- Propertyware Terms of Service (Nov 8, 2018)
- HappyCo Terms of Use (Sept 29, 2026)
- Florida Statutes 720.303, association records
- Florida Statutes 468.4334, return of association records
- California Civil Code 5230
- 15 U.S.C. 1681b, permissible purposes of consumer reports
- Buildium, 2027 Property Management Industry Report
- Census, Statistics of US Businesses 2022, detailed sizes
- Census, Statistics of US Businesses 2022, state by 6-digit NAICS
- NARPM, About
- PURE HomeRiver, join page
Brian Boesen · Founder, Regulr AI
Brian runs Regulr AI, which works for established businesses that want to license de-identified records to AI companies. He checks each program's published terms against its own pages and updates these guides when they change. Last updated October 18, 2026.
This page is general information, not legal advice, and Regulr is not a law firm. Rules vary by state, by profession and by contract, and they apply to your facts, not to a category. You approve exactly what is in scope before anything is shared.
Keep reading