Industry guide
Selling your construction company's data to AI companies: what buyers want and who qualifies
On this page
The short answer
Yes, you can sell a de-identified copy of your construction company's data to AI companies, and several buyers name construction outright. One buyer program puts construction in its premium, highest-offer tier, and one broker lists it among its strongest demand (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory). Each figure on this page is a program's own advertised term; our buyer directory lists the programs and links to their published terms. Buyers want what your team created: estimates with bid results and final cost, change orders, daily logs, schedules, job cost, safety inspections and photos.
Most programs look for 20+ full-time staff and 3+ years of records. Architects' drawings, subs' shop drawings, federal security material and row-level payroll usually stay out. You keep your records and license a copy.
Why AI companies want construction contractor data
AI labs are building agents that do skilled office work, and they need real examples of that work with real results attached. A contractor produces exactly that on every job. An estimator prices a scope and the bid is won or lost. A project manager negotiates a change order and the owner approves it or doesn't. A superintendent logs weather, manpower and delays every day, and the job finishes on time or late, under budget or with margin fade. Judgment followed by an outcome is the hardest training data for a lab to make on its own.
Three things make a contractor's records stand out:
- The records connect. A job number ties the estimate, the bid result, the subcontracts, the change orders, the dailies, the pay applications and the final job-cost report together. Buyers rank linked records with outcomes highest. One data marketplace lists its value factors as uniqueness, years of history, how connected your systems are, whether the data shows outcomes, and clean rights (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory).
- The money is visible. Estimate against actual cost, committed against forecast, billed against earned. In our view few industries hold expert judgment and its financial result side by side the way a contractor's job-cost history does.
- The field is documented. Daily logs, safety inspections, punch lists and dated job-site photos are dense, time-stamped records of physical work, which labs building agents for the real world have little of.
Buyers say so in their own words. The buyer program with construction in its premium tier lists the records it expects from a builder as bids, change orders, scheduling and invoicing. A data marketplace that names construction lists Procore and Buildertrend among the systems it takes and asks for photos and video of work, and a data lab names field records such as work orders, inspection notes and dispatch logs (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory). If you want the short version of what that means for your company, our construction overview lays out the records and the buyers on one page.
AI buyers that name construction and contractors
These are the programs in our registry whose own pages name construction, shown by type. Each cell is the program's own published term; our buyer directory lists the programs and links to where each says so.
| Program | What it names | Who qualifies | Advertised pay |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buyer program E | Construction | Most businesses need 20+ full-time US office employees; only office staff count. Accounting firms qualify at 10+ and law firms at 6+. Its affiliate FAQ adds 3+ years of records still in their systems, 5+ systems (email, internal chat, file storage, a CRM, plus one more), more than 50% of staff in the US, and ownership of the records. It is not accepting staffing agencies, title and escrow companies, cannabis, franchisees whose franchisor owns the systems, or defense and export-controlled work. Insurance is excluded in two of the program's three documents. Healthcare and dental practices are excluded in the FAQ but accepted in the other two. Architecture and engineering firms, MSPs and property managers are not named in any tier. | $100K to $5M advertised. Its calculator is labeled indicative only. The affiliate FAQ gives indicative offers of $200K to $500K for 20 to 49 US staff, $400K to $900K for 50 to 149, and $800K+ for 150+. |
| Broker A | Engineering and construction | 20+ full-time staff now or at peak, 3+ years of records, US-based, working mainly in English. Operating, downsizing and closed firms qualify. | An estimator example of $385K to $895K for a 100-person, 10-year firm, labeled an illustration based on its partner's payout model. |
| Marketplace A | Construction | "Any business, in any industry, with a few years of records." No hard minimum on size or history; longer history is valued more. Sellers must show they own the data and can license it. | "$250K+ Typical company deal," with larger archives "reaching the millions." The release describes payouts of "many times" six figures for some companies. |
| Buyer program K | Construction | "Any business with real operating history, in any sector." No headcount, years or geography minimum is published; it says the length and texture of the record matter more than headcount or revenue. | "$100K to $2M+." It says deals typically land between $100K and $2M and run higher for large or long records. Its site shows an example offer card for $640,000. |
| Buyer program L | Construction | Companies headquartered and operating in the United States only. No size minimum published. Data held on behalf of your own clients is out of scope unless you have the right to license it. | No range published. Every record is priced individually after the program reads a de-identified sample. |
| Broker D | Architecture, engineering and construction | Its estimate form accepts 20 to 5,000 full-time employees and 3 to 100 years in operation, with regions of US, Canada, Australia, Europe and other. "Data from any industry may qualify." | "Your company's operational data could be worth $50k-$4M+." It says the company keeps ownership of the underlying data and is paid for each licensing deal done with an AI lab. |
| Buyer program R | Construction | Not published. | Not published. |
A few notes on reading the table. Buyer program E is the one that puts construction in its premium tier, and it counts only office staff toward its 20-person gate. Broker A lists construction among its strongest demand and counts field staff, now or at your peak. Marketplace A names construction and Procore directly and publishes no minimum. Buyer program K's track record lists a $300K deal with a general contractor as a perpetual exclusive license (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory).
Other large programs take contractors on size rather than industry. One large AI training-data company names field services rather than construction and calls 40+ employees its preferred starting point, and several buyer programs accept most industries if you clear their headcount gates (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory).
What construction records AI buyers value
The pattern across buyers is simple: they want what your people estimated, wrote, decided and resolved. What the architect, your subs or your software vendors supplied usually stays out. Here is how that maps to a general contractor or specialty contractor.
| Record type | Where it usually lives | Why buyers value it |
|---|---|---|
| Estimates and bids, with win or loss and final cost | HCSS HeavyBid, STACK, Sage Estimating, ProEst, Bluebeam takeoffs, Excel | Priced expert judgment with a visible outcome: won or lost, then estimate against actual |
| Change orders and change-event logs | Procore, Autodesk Construction Cloud, Viewpoint Vista, Sage 300 CRE, CMiC | Cause, cost, schedule impact and a negotiated result |
| RFIs your team wrote | Procore, Autodesk Construction Cloud, email | Real field questions with context and how they were resolved |
| Daily logs and daily reports | Procore, Raken, HCSS HeavyJob | A dense daily record of weather, manpower, work done, delays and deliveries |
| Schedules: baseline, updates and as-built | Primavera P6, Microsoft Project, Procore | Planned against actual, with the reasons for each delay |
| Job-cost reports and WIP schedules | Sage 300 CRE, Sage 100 Contractor, Viewpoint Vista or Spectrum, Foundation, CMiC, QuickBooks | The money truth of each job: budget, committed, actual, forecast and fade |
| Pay applications and owner billing | Procore, Textura, GCPay, Excel schedules of values | Billed progress against physical progress, retainage and timing |
| Job-site photos, video and 360 captures | Procore Photos, CompanyCam, OpenSpace, drone platforms | Dated, labeled visual records of progress and defects |
| Safety inspections, JHAs, toolbox talks, near misses | Procore, SafetyCulture, HCSS Safety, Raken | Hazard recognition and corrective action with outcomes |
| Punch lists, quality and warranty calls | Procore, Fieldwire, Autodesk Construction Cloud | Defect types by trade and phase, and time to close |
| Equipment and fleet records | HCSS Equipment360, telematics platforms | Hours, maintenance and utilization over years |
| Internal email, chat, SOPs and training | Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Teams, shared drives | How the office coordinates estimating, buying, billing and closeout |
Two rows deserve a closer look. Change orders are yours to write, but they often quote the owner's contract and name subs, so they are reviewed rather than shipped as is. RFIs are the same: the question is your team's text, while the architect's answer and any sketch attached to it are the architect's work. Our guide to who owns construction documents walks through each document type.
The test that sorts most construction records
Did someone on your team estimate it, write it, log it or decide it? If yes, it is usually the kind of record buyers want. Was it drawn by the architect or engineer, prepared by a sub or supplier, or furnished by the owner? Then it usually stays out, even when it sits inside your Procore account.
Who qualifies to license construction company data
Headcount gates are where most contractors win or lose a buyer, and construction has a twist: most of your people work in the field, and programs count them differently.
| Program | Size gate | History |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer program E | 20+ full-time US office employees; only office staff count | 3+ years of records, 5+ systems |
| Broker A | 20+ full-time staff now or at peak; field staff count | 3+ years of records |
| Buyer program C | 20+ full-time employees | 3+ years in operation |
| Broker D | 20 to 5,000 full-time employees on its estimate form | 3+ years |
| Buyer program H | 40+ employees as a preferred starting point | Asks for years of records |
| Marketplace A, Buyer program K, Buyer program L | No minimum published; Buyer program L buys from US companies only | Longer history valued more |
Office staff and field staff
Buyer program E counts only office staff, and its own guide says a builder with 200 people in the field still needs about 20 at desks (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory). How many people that takes depends on your type of work. Federal wage survey data for May 2025 puts desk-type roles (management, business and financial, architecture and engineering, office and administrative, sales) at about 42% of nonresidential building construction, about 40% of residential building and about 22% of heavy and civil construction (source: BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025). By our estimate, a commercial GC clears 20 desk staff at roughly 50 total employees, a heavy-civil contractor at roughly 90, and a field-heavy specialty sub often needs 80 or more. Programs that count every full-time employee, such as Broker A, are the better fit when your desk count is short.
Years of history and one ERP
In our view the strongest candidates have 15+ years in business, ideally 10+ years of job cost in one accounting system and 5+ years on a project platform, because a migration often breaks the link between old jobs and the estimates and change orders around them. If you migrated but kept the old database, that archive may still count. An on-premise Sage or Vista database you still run is often the deepest record a contractor has.
How many contractors fit, for context
Census business counts for 2022 show about 62,000 construction firms with 20 to 499 employees. Leaving out the four trade codes covered in our HVAC, plumbing and electrical contractors guide leaves about 40,600. Commercial and institutional building GCs alone number 6,162 in that band, and about 2,200 have 50 to 499 employees (source: Census, Statistics of US Businesses 2022, detailed sizes). These counts include part-time staff, so treat them as an upper bound.
If your company develops, builds and manages its own apartment communities, our guide for vertically integrated multifamily developers covers the extra records that come with owning and operating the buildings.
What buyers advertise paying for contractor data
No buyer publishes a price for construction data specifically. What exists are each program's general ranges, which you can see in the table above. A few that matter for a contractor:
- Buyer program E, which puts construction in its premium tier: $100K to $5M advertised, with indicative offers in its FAQ of $200K to $500K for 20 to 49 US staff, $400K to $900K for 50 to 149, and $800K+ for 150+ (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory).
- Marketplace A, which names construction: “$250K+ Typical company deal” (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory).
- Buyer program K, which names construction: $100K to $2M+, with a $300K general contractor deal on its track-record page (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory).
- Broker D, which names architecture, engineering and construction: $50K to $4M+ on its estimate form (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory).
Treat estimators with care. Broker A's example for a 100-person, 10-year firm ($385K to $895K) is labeled an illustration and nearly matches another program's formula (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory), so the two are not independent valuations. What actually moves a contractor's price is years in one ERP, records that link a job from estimate to final cost, outcomes in the data, and how much has to be excluded. Our data value checker walks through those factors.
What usually stays out of a construction data license
Construction has more third-party authorship inside its systems than most industries. Procore's own annual report says customers can “invite all project participants, including owners, general contractors, specialty contractors, architects, and engineers” (source: Procore Technologies, Form 10-K for 2025), so a GC's account holds everyone's documents side by side. Sorting that out is the main work before you talk to buyers.
- Architects' and engineers' drawings and specifications. AIA's standard A201-2017 general conditions say the architect and its consultants are deemed the authors and owners of their Instruments of Service, and that the contractor, subs and suppliers may use them “solely and exclusively for execution of the Work” (§1.5.1 and §1.5.2) (source: AIA A201-2017 with AIA's additions and deletions report (University of Wisconsin System copy)). Architectural works, including plans and drawings, are protected by copyright (source: 17 U.S.C. § 102(a)(8), architectural works (Cornell LII)).
- Shop drawings, product data and submittals. A201 defines shop drawings as prepared “by the Contractor or a Subcontractor, Sub-subcontractor, manufacturer, supplier, or distributor” (§3.12.1) (source: AIA A201-2017 with AIA's additions and deletions report (University of Wisconsin System copy)). The content is mostly your subs' and suppliers'; at most your submittal log dates and status might be reviewed for inclusion.
- Sub and supplier quotes. Pricing given to you in confidence at bid time is reviewed line by line or left out.
- Owner-confidential information. Prime contracts often carry confidentiality clauses, and A201 itself requires the contractor to keep owner financing information marked confidential (§2.2.4) (source: AIA A201-2017 with AIA's additions and deletions report (University of Wisconsin System copy)).
- Federal security material. Controlled unclassified information (source: 32 CFR 2002.4, controlled unclassified information (Cornell LII)), export-controlled technical data, sensitive security information on airport and transit work (source: 49 CFR 1520.5, sensitive security information (Cornell LII)) and critical energy infrastructure information on utility work (source: 18 CFR 388.113, critical energy infrastructure information (Cornell LII)) carry their own handling rules. At least one buyer program does not accept defense and export-controlled work at all (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory).
- Payroll, certified payroll and injury records. Row-level wage and health records about your workers are not training data. Buyers exclude them or take aggregates by job.
- Surety, bonding and banking files. Financial statements prepared for your surety and bank stay out.
- Projects run on the owner's platform account. If the owner bought the Procore or Autodesk subscription, the owner is the platform customer for that project and controls its export.
- Records under legal hold. Anything tied to a pending claim, lien dispute or defect case stays out.
None of this empties the dataset. Strip the drawings, submittals, sub pricing and federal material, and what remains (your estimates, bid results, change orders, dailies, schedules, job cost, safety records and photos) is the part buyers say they want. You approve the scope, and each exclusion is named in the contract.
Construction software and licensing contractor data for AI training
Your systems decide how the records come out, so their terms matter. The terms we read on October 18, 2026 mostly say the contractor owns its data, with three caveats that recur: a vendor's own AI or anonymized-data rights, limits on automated access, and short export windows after you cancel.
- Procore. The subscription agreement says customer data is “owned exclusively by Customer” (§5.1), bars robots, spiders and web-scraping (§2.2(l)), and gives 30 days after the final term to retrieve data (§10.5(d)) (source: Procore Subscription Services Agreement v.2025.01.24). Separately, Procore's API terms say a developer that commercially distributes an app may not use API data to “train, re-train, fine-tune or benchmark” AI or bulk export it without a separate agreement (§5.4) (source: Procore API Terms of Use v1.8, effective Sept 30, 2025). In our reading that reaches a buyer's extraction tool more than your own exports, so plan the export through Procore's own export features and your ERP. Trade press has covered Procore cutting off API access for one AI agent provider (source: ENR, construction platforms and AI training data (Jun 12, 2026)).
- Sage 300 CRE and Sage 100 Contractor. Sage's August 2026 license terms for both products, as we read them on October 15, 2026, keep customer data with the customer but bar making it available to an external AI training, fine-tuning or model development pipeline without Sage's authorization (source: Sage 300 CRE end user license terms, August 2026, Sage 100 Contractor end user license terms, August 2026). Sage-held job cost is the part that needs the most care.
- Viewpoint Vista and Spectrum. Trimble's Offering Terms say “Customer owns all Customer Data” (3.1), while Trimble owns anonymized and usage data (source: Trimble Offering Terms v4.1 (Oct 13, 2026)). For hosted ERP, Trimble makes customer data available for 30 days after an order ends (Supplemental Terms 9.2(c)) (source: Trimble Supplemental Terms for Software v3.0 (Aug 13, 2026)).
- HCSS HeavyBid and HeavyJob. HCSS keeps customer data for 60 days after termination and then deletes it (§14.7) (source: HCSS Services Agreement (Mar 5, 2026)), and anything entered in HCSS Copilot carries a perpetual license for training that feature (§7) (source: HCSS Product-Specific Terms (Apr 6, 2026)).
- Field and document tools. Raken gives 90 days to request data after termination (8.7) and limits access to its own interface (5.6(ix)) (source: Raken Terms of Service (updated Sept 24, 2026)). Bluebeam's 30 days of post-termination access must be requested in writing on or before the termination date (7.4.6) (source: Bluebeam General Terms and Conditions (Mar 7, 2026)). Fieldwire allows 5 business days to extract after the term (2.3) (source: Fieldwire Services Description and Software Specific Terms). OpenSpace may use derived data to train and commercialize AI models (7.3) (source: OpenSpace Terms and Conditions (Nov 1, 2024)), so OpenSpace captures are hard to license exclusively.
Procore is big enough that this matters to most mid-size contractors: it reported 2,871 organic customers paying more than $100,000 a year as of June 30, 2026 (source: Procore, second quarter 2026 results (Jul 29, 2026)). Our guide to Procore data export and Sage, Vista and HCSS terms goes system by system, including Foundation and CMiC, and covers what to export before a license or a contract change.
If you are selling the construction company or planning succession
Many contractors are owned by a founder or a second generation thinking about what comes next: a sale to a strategic buyer or private equity, a management buyout, an ESOP, or a planned wind-down. A data license is one more contract a buyer of your company will read in diligence, and exclusivity is the term to watch. One buyer program requires 24 months of seller exclusivity, and another's published deals are perpetual exclusive licenses (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory).
Licensing before a sale can turn years of archived jobs into cash the acquirer does not pay you for. Licensing after a sale usually means the records belong to the new owner. And if you are closing the company, the records are worth the most while the software subscriptions are still active. Our guide to selling a construction company and licensing the records first covers timing, succession paths and the export deadlines that start when you cancel.
How a construction data licensing deal runs, step by step
- Inventory. List your systems (project platform, ERP, estimating, scheduling, field and photo apps, email, shared drives), how many years each holds, and roughly how many jobs a year you run. Nothing leaves your systems at this stage.
- Scope. Decide what is in and what is out. Drawings and specs, submittals, sub quotes, federal security material, payroll and injury records, and anything under legal hold are the usual exclusions. You approve the scope, and it is written into the contract.
- De-identification. Owner, architect, sub and worker names are masked or replaced with consistent tokens, project addresses are removed, and faces, plates and badges are blurred in photos, so a job still links end to end without naming anyone. One buyer program says a specialist PII partner strips identifying fields before it or any lab sees the records (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory).
- Offers. Buyers review a sample or a description and make an offer. One program says it makes an offer within one to two weeks of intake (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory).
- Terms. Price, payment schedule, exact scope, exclusivity, permitted uses, deletion at the end of the term, and the warranties you give about your rights to the records.
- Delivery. The records go from your systems to the buyer you chose. With Regulr, they never pass through us.
- Payment. Timing varies widely. One program pays net 30 to 60 days after the data is approved, and another's materials give timelines of about two to three months from first conversation, with payment within 30 days of invoice (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory).
The best position is more than one written offer, because buyers price the same records differently and their terms differ even more. That comparison is the work Regulr does for the seller. If you want to see how your company would come out, see what your construction records could qualify for.
How Regulr is paid, and how we write these pages
Regulr is a sell-side advisor. When a business we introduce signs a license, we may be paid a fee by the buyer or through a program's referral terms. We list every program we can verify whether or not it pays us, order is never set by fees, and every figure is the company's own advertised term with a link to where it says so. Regulr has not closed a data deal yet, so nothing here describes our results.
Frequently asked questions
Can a construction company sell its data to AI companies?
Yes. Several AI training-data companies license de-identified copies of company records, and some name construction outright, including one buyer program that puts construction in its premium, highest-offer tier. What a deal covers is what your own team created: estimates and bid results, change orders, daily logs, schedules, job-cost history, safety inspections and job-site photos. Architects' drawings, subcontractors' shop drawings and other third-party documents usually stay out. You license a copy and keep your originals.
How much is a contractor's data worth to AI buyers?
No buyer publishes a construction-specific price. The programs that name construction advertise broad ranges, such as $100K to $5M at one buyer program and $100K to $2M+ at another, and one program's own track record lists a $300K deal with a general contractor. What moves the number is years of history in one ERP, records that link a job from estimate to final cost, and how much has to be excluded. Advertised ranges are not offers, and only a written offer tells you what a buyer will pay.
Do field crews count toward the headcount minimum?
It depends on the program. One buyer program counts only office staff and says a builder with 200 people in the field still needs about 20 at desks. Other programs count every full-time employee, so superintendents, foremen and crews count there. Estimators, project managers, project engineers, schedulers, accountants and safety staff count everywhere.
Can I license the drawings and specs in my Procore account?
Usually not. Under AIA's standard A201-2017 general conditions, the architect and its consultants are deemed the authors and owners of the drawings and specifications, and the contractor and its subs may use them only to build the project. Shop drawings come from your subs, fabricators and suppliers. What you can usually license is what your team wrote around those documents: estimates, RFIs you asked, change orders, daily logs and your own markups, scoped one by one.
Does Sage 300 CRE or Sage 100 Contractor let me license job-cost data?
Sage's August 2026 license terms for both products, as we read them on October 15, 2026, keep customer data with the customer but bar making it available to an external AI training, fine-tuning or model development pipeline without Sage's authorization. So job cost held in Sage is the part of a contractor's records that needs the most care. Buyers typically ask how the export was made and whether Sage authorized it, or leave that data out.
We do some federal and defense work. Can we still license our records?
Often yes, for the commercial side, but the federal records usually stay out. Controlled unclassified information, export-controlled technical data and transportation security information carry their own handling rules, and at least one buyer program does not accept defense and export-controlled work at all. A contractor whose work is mostly federal, defense or airport security is a poor fit.
Do I lose my records or my Procore history if I license it?
No. A data license gives the buyer a de-identified copy for an agreed use and term. Your project platform, ERP, estimating files and email stay where they are, and you keep running jobs on them. The license terms decide what the buyer may do with the copy, whether it is exclusive, and whether it must be deleted at the end.
Will owners, architects or subs find out we licensed our data?
Buyers license records with owner, architect, subcontractor and worker names masked or replaced with consistent tokens, and project addresses removed, so the dataset is not meant to point back to any one job or client. That is not a guarantee: a landmark project or a small market can make a record easier to trace. Agree in writing on what is excluded, that the buyer will not try to re-identify anyone, and whether your company's name stays confidential.
Sources
Program terms checked against their own pages on October 15, 2026; our buyer directory lists the programs and links to their published terms. Procore, Trimble, HCSS, Raken, Bluebeam, OpenSpace and Fieldwire terms, the AIA A201 text and 17 U.S.C. read on October 18, 2026. Sage terms as read on October 15, 2026. Census and BLS figures computed from the public files on October 15, 2026.
- program terms, Regulr buyer directory
- Procore Subscription Services Agreement v.2025.01.24
- Procore API Terms of Use v1.8, effective Sept 30, 2025
- Procore Technologies, Form 10-K for 2025
- Procore, second quarter 2026 results (Jul 29, 2026)
- Sage 300 CRE end user license terms, August 2026
- Sage 100 Contractor end user license terms, August 2026
- Trimble Offering Terms v4.1 (Oct 13, 2026)
- Trimble Supplemental Terms for Software v3.0 (Aug 13, 2026)
- HCSS Services Agreement (Mar 5, 2026)
- HCSS Product-Specific Terms (Apr 6, 2026)
- Raken Terms of Service (updated Sept 24, 2026)
- Bluebeam General Terms and Conditions (Mar 7, 2026)
- OpenSpace Terms and Conditions (Nov 1, 2024)
- Fieldwire Services Description and Software Specific Terms
- AIA A201-2017 with AIA's additions and deletions report (University of Wisconsin System copy)
- 17 U.S.C. § 102(a)(8), architectural works (Cornell LII)
- 17 U.S.C. § 120, scope of architectural works (Cornell LII)
- 32 CFR 2002.4, controlled unclassified information (Cornell LII)
- 49 CFR 1520.5, sensitive security information (Cornell LII)
- 18 CFR 388.113, critical energy infrastructure information (Cornell LII)
- Census, Statistics of US Businesses 2022, detailed sizes
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025
- ENR, construction platforms and AI training data (Jun 12, 2026)
Brian Boesen · Founder, Regulr AI
Brian runs Regulr AI, which works for established businesses that want to license de-identified records to AI companies. He checks each program's published terms against its own pages and updates these guides when they change. Last updated October 18, 2026.
This page is general information, not legal advice, and Regulr is not a law firm. Rules vary by state, by profession and by contract, and they apply to your facts, not to a category. You approve exactly what is in scope before anything is shared.
Keep reading