Software and SaaS companies
Shutting down a startup: how to sell the code and records before the company dissolves
On this page
- What happens to IP when a company dissolves
- Why buyers want closed startups' records
- Who buys from closed companies
- Wind-down services and data sales
- Asset sale, acqui-hire or data license
- Winding down a startup, step by step
- Export deadlines after you cancel
- Employees, privacy and what stays out
- FAQ
- Sources
The short answer
Shutting down a startup does not end its ownership of its code and records. A dissolved Delaware corporation continues for three years to wind up, including to dispose of and convey its property (source: Delaware Code Title 8, Section 278), and several AI data programs buy code and records from companies that are winding down or closed (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory). Each figure on this page is a program's own advertised term; our buyer directory lists the programs and links to their published terms.
The constraint is time. Hosted tools delete data 30 to 60 days after cancellation, and a Slack workspace that drops to free shows only 90 days of history. Export first, keep someone who can sign, then cancel.
What happens to IP when a company is dissolved
Founders searching how to dissolve a startup usually find checklists for final payroll, tax filings and the certificate of dissolution. The assets get less attention, but the rule is simple: the company owns its code, documents and records until it sells, assigns or distributes them.
Delaware, where most venture-backed startups are incorporated, says all dissolved corporations “shall nevertheless be continued” for three years, or longer if the Court of Chancery directs, for purposes that include winding up and the power “to dispose of and convey their property”, but not to continue the business (source: Delaware Code Title 8, Section 278). In plain terms, a dissolved company can still sign a sale or license of its records during that period, as long as someone has authority to sign for it.
Three practical points follow:
- Ownership must be clean. A copyright transfer is not valid without a signed writing (source: 17 U.S.C. 204, transfers in writing (Cornell LII)), so contractor code without an assignment is still a gap at shutdown. Fix it while contractors are still reachable.
- The proceeds follow the usual order. Money from a data sale goes to the company, which pays creditors before shareholders. MIT Technology Review noted that such proceeds usually go to senior creditors and investors (source: MIT Technology Review, data from shut-down startups (Oct 13, 2026)).
- Consents still apply. Board approval, preferred-holder consent under your charter, and any venture lender's lien on IP carry through a wind-down. Read your financing documents before you sign with a buyer.
Why AI buyers want a closed startup's code and Slack history
A startup that ran for several years leaves a complete record of a team building a product: code with full history, pull requests and reviews, tickets, incidents, specs and years of Slack. MIT Technology Review reported on October 13, 2026 that one wind-down service has handled more than 150 deals and that 47% of that service's deals now include code or data sales, and that buyers value Slack history for the variety and depth of its conversations (source: MIT Technology Review, data from shut-down startups (Oct 13, 2026)).
The same article said one wind-down service values a client's assets by headcount, years in operation, data volume and how the team used its tools (source: MIT Technology Review, data from shut-down startups (Oct 13, 2026)). That matches what buyers say about operating companies: history and linked records are worth more than any single export. Our guide for software and SaaS companies covers which engineering records buyers rank highest.
Who buys code and records from closed companies
These are the programs in our registry whose own terms accept companies that are winding down or no longer operating, shown by type.
| Program | What it says about closed companies | Other gates |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer program F | Accepts operating or winding-down companies | Codebases need 50K+ lines of code |
| Buyer program P | Accepts operating, winding-down and closed companies; a liquidator or administrator can sign | Lists code and PRs, Slack and Teams, tickets |
| Buyer program A | Runs a separate form for defunct companies | 50+ employees at peak |
| Broker A | Operating, downsizing and closed firms qualify | 20+ full-time staff now or at peak, 3+ years of records |
| Buyer program M | Its intake also takes companies no longer operating | 20+ full-time employees |
| Wind-down service A | Sells shutting-down companies' code and workspace data | Also runs the wind-down itself |
| Wind-down service B | Buys shutting-down companies' datasets outright | Sets the price as the buyer |
Two notes. Peak headcount matters more than current headcount for most of these, so a company that had 60 people and now has 4 may still fit. And programs that buy code on its own care about the codebase more than the team: our guide to selling source code to AI companies covers what they pay for.
Wind-down services and data sales: the trade-offs
A growing set of startup wind-down services now handle data sales as part of closing a company. They come in two types:
- Services that run the dissolution and sell assets. They handle the legal, tax and operational steps of shutting down and also find buyers for code and workspace data. One advertises “tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars for unique assets” (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory).
- Services that buy the dataset outright. They purchase the records themselves and license them onward, so the price is theirs to set (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory).
Both are fast, which matters when payroll has stopped. The trade-off, in our view, is price discovery and terms. An outright sale ends any later license, and one buyer's number is not a market. One data marketplace says a company winding down usually sells rather than licenses (source: program terms, Regulr buyer directory), which is often right, but a sale with competing offers is a different result from a sale to the first bidder. Ask any service which buyers it shows your records to, whether it is the buyer itself, and what it is paid.
Asset sale, acqui-hire or data license: how they fit together
A data sale is rarely the only exit on the table. Many wind-downs also look for an acqui-hire, a sale of the product to a competitor, or a sale of the customer contracts. The order matters, because each deal can take rights the others need.
- Selling the product or the code to an acquirer. If an acquirer buys the codebase outright, the company no longer owns it and cannot license it afterward. Agree up front whether a de-identified copy licensed for AI training is carved out, or license it first on a nonexclusive basis and disclose the license to the acquirer.
- An acqui-hire. The acquirer usually wants the people, sometimes the IP. If it does not take the IP, the company still holds the code and records and can sell them separately.
- Selling customer contracts. Customer data moves with the contracts or is deleted under them. It stays out of any AI data sale either way.
In our view the simplest sequence is to line up every possible buyer at the same time, then sign in the order that keeps the most value: product or IP buyer first if one exists, with the data license carved out in writing, then the data license.
Winding down a startup, step by step, with the data sale built in
- Decide early. Make the data sale part of the wind-down plan before layoffs, while the people who know each system can describe it and run the exports.
- Freeze deletion. Turn off auto-delete and short retention settings in Slack, Google Workspace or Microsoft 365, and your support tools. Stop anyone from deleting repos or workspaces.
- Export while plans are paid. Full Slack exports with private channels and DMs, every repo with history, PRs and reviews, Jira or Linear, Confluence or Notion, and support tickets. Our guide to GitHub, Slack, Jira and Linear data export lists what each export misses.
- Keep a signer. One officer or director with authority to sign, a board resolution approving the sale or license, and the investor and lender consents your documents require.
- Scope and de-identify. Customer content, HR records and secrets stay out; people are replaced with consistent tokens. You approve the scope in writing.
- Take it to buyers. Several programs accept closed companies. Compare price, timing, exclusivity and who does the extraction.
- Sign, deliver, then cancel. Cancel the hosted tools only after delivery is accepted, then finish the dissolution.
The most common way the records are lost
Cards stop being paid, plans lapse, and a month later the data is gone. A startup that had a buyer willing to pay for its history but cancelled Slack, Jira and GitHub first has nothing left to sell.
Export deadlines after you cancel your tools
| Tool | What happens after you stop paying | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Slack | A free workspace shows 90 days of history; free-plan content older than one year may be deleted and cannot be restored. Private channels and DMs export only on Business+ or Enterprise | (see: Slack Help Center, message and file history on free workspaces, Slack Help Center, export your workspace data) |
| Atlassian (Jira, Confluence) | Data kept 15 days on free and 60 days on paid subscriptions after deactivation, then permanently deleted | (see: Atlassian Support, reactivate a subscription) |
| Linear | Deletion within 30 days of termination for cause, on request after termination, or when the workspace is deleted | (see: Linear Terms of Service (effective Jun 9, 2026)) |
| GitHub Actions | Logs and artifacts kept 90 days by default, even while the account is active | (see: GitHub Docs, retention for Actions artifacts and logs) |
Email, documents and calendars carry their own windows, and support and CRM tools vary by vendor, so check each contract before you cancel. Treat 30 days from the end of a paid plan as the outer limit unless the vendor's terms say otherwise.
Employees, privacy and what stays out of a closed startup's data sale
Selling a team's Slack history raises fair questions. MIT Technology Review reported that one law professor argues employers should get express consent before selling workers' data, and that no federal law currently bans such sales (source: MIT Technology Review, data from shut-down startups (Oct 13, 2026)). Buyers typically handle it through scope and de-identification:
- HR, recruiting, compensation, health and performance records stay out.
- Employee and customer names are replaced with consistent tokens throughout.
- Customer content held under your customer agreements stays out, as it would for an operating company.
- Secrets, credentials and security reports are removed from code and chat.
- DMs can be excluded entirely if you decide they should be.
Many founders also tell the team before the sale. If you want to see how this would apply to your company, start with how Regulr takes a company's records to several buyers, or check the factors in our data value checker.
How Regulr is paid, and how we write these pages
Regulr is a sell-side advisor. When a business we introduce signs a license, we may be paid a fee by the buyer or through a program's referral terms. We list every program we can verify whether or not it pays us, order is never set by fees, and every figure is the company's own advertised term with a link to where it says so. Regulr has not closed a data deal yet, so nothing here describes our results.
Frequently asked questions
What happens to IP when a company is dissolved?
The company keeps owning its IP until it sells, assigns or distributes it. Under Delaware law, a dissolved corporation continues for three years, or longer if the Court of Chancery directs, to wind up its affairs, including to dispose of and convey its property. If nobody sells the code and records, they are usually left with the dissolved entity or distributed with its other assets. Selling or licensing them during the wind-down turns them into cash for creditors and shareholders.
Can I sell my startup's code after it shuts down?
Yes, if the company still owns it, still has a copy, and someone has authority to sign for it. Several AI data programs accept companies that are winding down or closed, and one says a liquidator or administrator can sign. The common failure is not legal but practical: hosted tools delete data within weeks of cancellation, so the records are gone before anyone tries to sell them.
How do I shut down a startup and sell its data?
Decide on the data sale before layoffs and cancellations, not after. Export Slack, GitHub, Jira, Linear, Google Workspace and support tools while the paid plans are active, keep one person with signing authority and the board's approval, and confirm investor and lender consents. Then take the records to buyers, sign, deliver, and finish the dissolution. Proceeds go through the company like any other asset sale.
How much is a dead startup's data worth?
Advertised figures range widely. MIT Technology Review reported one shut-down crypto startup's codebase selling for roughly $25,000, with its workspace data expected to bring about $15,000. One data marketplace reports code sales by closing companies of about $10,000 to $100,000, and programs that buy full operating records advertise six figures and up for larger teams with years of history. None of these are offers.
Do employees have to consent before a startup sells its Slack data?
No US federal law currently bans these sales, as MIT Technology Review noted, but the question is real and contested. Buyers typically remove personal information and exclude HR records, and employee names are replaced with consistent tokens. Many founders also tell the team before a sale. You decide the scope in writing, including whether DMs are in or out.
Should a wind-down service sell my startup's data, or should I shop it?
Some wind-down services run the dissolution and also sell code and workspace data, and others buy the dataset outright and set the price. That is convenient when time is short. Taking the records to several buyers usually takes longer and can surface a better price or terms, and a license rather than a sale may let the company or its successor license the same records again.
Who gets the money when a closed startup sells its data?
The company does, and then it pays creditors before shareholders like any other wind-down proceeds. MIT Technology Review noted that sale proceeds usually go to senior creditors and investors, not employees. If there is venture debt, the lender may hold a lien on the IP and need to approve the sale.
Sources
Delaware Code Section 278, MIT Technology Review, and Slack, Atlassian, Linear and GitHub pages read on their own sites on October 18, 2026. Program terms checked October 15, 2026; our buyer directory lists the programs and links to their published terms.
- Delaware Code Title 8, Section 278
- MIT Technology Review, data from shut-down startups (Oct 13, 2026)
- program terms, Regulr buyer directory
- Slack Help Center, export your workspace data
- Slack Help Center, message and file history on free workspaces
- Atlassian Support, reactivate a subscription
- Linear Terms of Service (effective Jun 9, 2026)
- GitHub Docs, retention for Actions artifacts and logs
- 17 U.S.C. 204, transfers in writing (Cornell LII)
Brian Boesen · Founder, Regulr AI
Brian runs Regulr AI, which works for established businesses that want to license de-identified records to AI companies. He checks each program's published terms against its own pages and updates these guides when they change. Last updated October 18, 2026.
This page is general information, not legal advice, and Regulr is not a law firm. Rules vary by state, by profession and by contract, and they apply to your facts, not to a category. You approve exactly what is in scope before anything is shared.
Keep reading