Industry guide
Selling your freight brokerage's data to AI companies: what buyers want and who qualifies
On this page
The short answer
Yes, a freight brokerage or 3PL can license a de-identified copy of its records to AI companies, and some buyers name the category outright. Scale AI lists “Freight Brokerage & 3PL” (source: Scale AI, data partnerships), and Pewter puts logistics first in its strongest demand (source: Pewter partners). Buyers want what your team created in the TMS and email: spot quotes with win or loss, carrier negotiations, check calls, exceptions and claims.
Most programs look for about 20+ full-time staff and several years of history. DAT and Truckstop data, carrier vetting reports and rates under shipper NDAs usually stay out. You keep your records and license a copy.
Why AI companies want freight brokerage data
AI labs are building agents that do office work, and they need examples of real work with real results. A brokerage produces exactly that, all day. Every spot quote ends in a win or a loss. Every load has a buy rate, a sell rate and a margin. Every late pickup, TONU or detention charge ends with someone paying for it. That is judgment with an outcome attached, which is the hardest training data for a lab to make on its own.
Three things make a brokerage stand out from other businesses with the same headcount:
- Almost everyone works at a desk. Carrier sales, customer sales, operations, track and trace, and accounting all work in a TMS and an inbox. In a pure brokerage the drivers work for the carriers you hire, so nearly all of your records are desk records.
- The records connect. A load number ties the quote, the tender, the rate confirmation, the check calls, the POD and the invoice together. Linked records with outcomes are what buyers rank highest. Troveo lists its value factors as uniqueness, years of history, how connected your systems are, whether the data shows outcomes, and clean rights (source: Troveo, business data).
- The volume is high. By our estimate, a 50-person brokerage can move tens of thousands of loads a year, each with its own trail of emails, calls and notes.
Buyers say so in their own words. Troveo's logistics guide says buyers have told it “logistics is on the list of industries they'll pay a premium for” (source: Troveo, logistics data licensing guide (Oct 13, 2026)). Mercor lists “Logistics & Supply Chain” with “Shipping manifests, dispatch logs, invoices” as its examples (source: Mercor, Monetize your data). HUMXN lists logistics and trucking and buys jobs, dispatch and scheduling records (source: HUMXN partners). If you want the short version of what that means for your company, the freight and logistics overview lays out the records and the buyers in one page.
AI buyers that name freight brokerage and logistics
These are the programs in our registry whose own pages name freight or logistics. Each cell is the company's own published term, with a link to where it says so.
| Program | What it names | Who qualifies | Advertised pay |
|---|---|---|---|
| micro1 | Operations and logistics (source: micro1, data partnerships) | 30+ employees, operationally mature, English. US first, then the UK and Canada. Its operating-company form describes 30 to 200 employees. A separate defunct-company form asks for 50+ employees at peak. Its video-collection program asks for "Companies with at least 20 employees." (source: micro1, data partnerships, micro1 operating-company form, micro1 defunct-company form, micro1 video-collection program post) | Advertised tiers of $100K+ for a qualified partnership, $500K+ for large or multi-team datasets, and $1M+ for highly unique data. The referral page says $100K to $2M+ for approved data packages. (source: micro1, data partnerships, micro1, company referral) |
| Mercor | Logistics and supply chain (source: Mercor, Monetize your data) | No headcount, years or geography published. Companies check eligibility through a qualification form. (source: Mercor, Monetize your data) | No range published. Price is based on data volume, the number of tools connected, and depth. No upfront costs, setup fees or deductions. (source: Mercor, Monetize your data) |
| Pewter | Freight and logistics (source: Pewter) | 20+ full-time staff now or at peak, 3+ years of records, US-based, working mainly in English. Operating, downsizing and closed firms qualify. (source: Pewter) | An estimator example of $385K to $895K for a 100-person, 10-year firm, labeled an illustration based on its partner's payout model. (source: Pewter) |
| HUMXN Research Labs | Logistics and transport (source: HUMXN, sell company data, Yahoo Finance, Oct 13, 2026, HUMXN partners) | "Any business, in any industry, with a few years of records." No hard minimum on size or history; longer history is valued more. Sellers must show they own the data and can license it. (source: HUMXN partners, HUMXN, sell company data) | "$250K+ Typical company deal," with larger archives "reaching the millions." The release describes payouts of "many times" six figures for some companies. (source: HUMXN, sell company data, Yahoo Finance, Oct 13, 2026) |
| Endless | Logistics and freight (source: Endless) | About 30+ employees, several years of history, English. US, UK and Canada first. (source: Endless) | "Get up to $4M." A fixed sum is agreed before any data is shared. (source: Endless) |
| Scale AI (Data Partnerships) | Industrial, energy and logistics; Freight brokerage and 3PL (source: Scale AI, data partnerships) | "40+ employees" is its "preferred starting point," assessed case by case. It asks for years of records. No geography is stated. (source: Scale AI, data partnerships) | "$10K to $1M+" as an "illustrative value per data partnership, scaling with cadence." It says its partnerships are designed so there is opportunity for recurring revenue. (source: Scale AI, data partnerships) |
| Labelbox Prism | Manufacturing, logistics and telecom (source: Labelbox Prism) | No headcount or years minimum published. It offers regional data residency guarantees. (source: Labelbox Prism) | Smaller datasets start around $50K and large partnerships reach "$1M+," paid as an upfront fee at signing plus a revenue share on downstream use. (source: Labelbox Prism) |
| Polyshares | Logistics (source: Polyshares) | "Any business with real operating history, in any sector." No headcount, years or geography minimum is published; it says the length and texture of the record matter more than headcount or revenue. (source: Polyshares) | "$100K to $2M+." It says deals typically land between $100K and $2M and run higher for large or long records. Its site shows an example offer card for $640,000. (source: Polyshares) |
| Anthroly | Logistics (source: Anthroly) | Companies headquartered and operating in the United States only. No size minimum published. Data held on behalf of your own clients is out of scope unless you have the right to license it. (source: Anthroly) | No range published. Every record is priced individually after Anthroly reads a de-identified sample. (source: Anthroly) |
| Sureform | Logistics and transportation (source: Sureform) | Its estimate form accepts 20 to 5,000 full-time employees and 3 to 100 years in operation, with regions of US, Canada, Australia, Europe and other. "Data from any industry may qualify." (source: Sureform, estimate) | "Your company's operational data could be worth $50k-$4M+." It says the company keeps ownership of the underlying data and is paid for each licensing deal done with an AI lab. (source: Sureform) |
A few notes on reading the table. Scale AI is the only buyer that names “Freight Brokerage & 3PL” word for word, under its industrial, energy and logistics heading (source: Scale AI, data partnerships). micro1 names operations and logistics as one of six domains (source: micro1, data partnerships), and Endless names logistics and freight first in its list (source: Endless). Troveo is not in the table because its program page names no industries, but its logistics guide asks for shipment and tracking records, routing and dispatch decisions, warehouse and inventory records, purchase orders, and delay, damage and claims records (source: Troveo, logistics data licensing guide (Oct 13, 2026)).
Other large programs take brokerages on size rather than industry. Mode, Handshake AI and Replay accept most industries if you clear their headcount gates (source: Mode, data program, Handshake AI, data partnerships, Replay, referrals). Our full buyer directory lists every program we track, and the profiles of micro1, Mercor and Handshake AI go deeper on the three largest.
What freight brokerage and 3PL records AI buyers value
The pattern across buyers is simple: they want what your people wrote, decided and resolved. What your software vendors supplied usually stays out. Here is how that maps to a brokerage.
| Record type | Where it usually lives | Why buyers value it |
|---|---|---|
| Spot quotes and quote emails, with won or lost | TMS quote module (McLeod PowerBroker, Aljex, Tai, Turvo, Revenova), Outlook or Gmail, Excel | Pricing judgment under time pressure, with a known outcome and margin |
| Lane bids and RFP responses | Excel, email, TMS contract rates, shipper bid portals | Structured pricing across many lanes, with award results |
| Load tenders and EDI (204, 990, 214, 210) | TMS EDI module, EDI providers | Clean, timestamped event streams from tender to invoice |
| Dispatch and check-call logs | TMS check calls and notes entered by your team | Long sequences of updates and decisions that end in on time or late |
| Exceptions, accessorials and claims | TMS notes and claims module, email, Excel | Who pays for a TONU, detention, layover or OS&D claim, and why |
| Carrier sourcing and negotiation threads | Outlook or Gmail, Teams or Slack, TMS carrier notes, phone system recordings | Negotiation reasoning and capacity search, which is hard to find anywhere else |
| Carrier approval decisions and scorecards | TMS carrier profile, BI tools | Your own approve or reject calls and carrier performance over time |
| Invoicing, AR, collections, carrier pay and quick-pay | TMS accounting, QuickBooks, NetSuite, Sage Intacct | Credit, collections and payment patterns linked to outcomes |
| Sales CRM history | Salesforce (including Revenova), HubSpot | Sales cycles you can tie to the freight that followed |
| SOPs, training decks and playbooks | Google Drive, SharePoint, Notion, a learning system | Your written rules for quoting, vetting carriers and handling exceptions |
| 3PL warehouse records | WMS such as Extensiv, Deposco, Logiwa, Manhattan | High-volume receipts, orders, counts and labor, often owned in part by your clients |
Two rows deserve a closer look. Carrier approval decisions are yours, but many brokers copy scores and fields from a vetting service into the TMS carrier profile, and those fields belong to the vendor (more below). Warehouse records are often partly your clients': Troveo's guide excludes “Records your customers own” (source: Troveo, logistics data licensing guide (Oct 13, 2026)), so a 3PL's brand-client contracts usually set the limit.
The test that sorts most freight records
Did someone on your team type it, decide it or write it? If yes, it is usually the kind of record buyers want. Did it arrive from a load board, a rate tool, a vetting service or a tracking platform? Then it usually stays out, even when it sits inside your TMS.
Who qualifies to license freight broker data
Headcount gates are where most brokerages win or lose a buyer. The good news for a brokerage is that the desk team is most of the company.
| Program | Size gate | History |
|---|---|---|
| Mode | 20+ full-time US office employees (source: Mode, data program) | 3+ years of records still in your systems (source: Mode affiliate FAQ (Oct 14, 2026)) |
| Handshake AI | 20+ full-time employees (source: Handshake AI, license your data) | 3+ years in operation (source: Handshake AI, license your data) |
| Pewter | 20+ full-time staff now or at peak (source: Pewter) | 3+ years of records (source: Pewter) |
| Sureform | 20 to 5,000 full-time employees on its estimate form (source: Sureform, estimate) | 3 to 100 years in operation (source: Sureform, estimate) |
| micro1 | 30+ employees; its form describes 30 to 200 (source: micro1, data partnerships, micro1 operating-company form) | No minimum published (source: micro1, data partnerships) |
| Endless | About 30+ employees (source: Endless) | Several years of history (source: Endless) |
| Scale AI | 40+ employees as a preferred starting point (source: Scale AI, data partnerships) | Asks for years of records (source: Scale AI, data partnerships) |
| Polyshares, HUMXN, Anthroly | No minimum published; Anthroly buys from US companies only (source: Polyshares, HUMXN partners, Anthroly) | Longer history valued more (source: Polyshares, HUMXN partners) |
Drivers and office staff
In a pure brokerage the drivers work for your carriers or are owner-operators, so they are not your employees and do not count. Your carrier reps, customer reps, operations and track-and-trace staff, and accounting team do. Mode states its gate as full-time US office employees (source: Mode, data program), which suits a brokerage well: a 25-person brokerage is mostly desk staff, while a trucking company several times that size may have fewer people in the office. If you run an asset-based carrier with a brokerage division, count only the brokerage and office staff, and ask each buyer how it treats drivers before you rely on its gate.
Years of history and one TMS
Brokers only have to keep a record of each transaction for three years under 49 CFR 371.3 (source: 49 CFR 371.3 (Cornell LII)), so anything older is history you chose to keep. In our view the strongest candidates have 7 or more years of records, ideally 8 or more on the same TMS with email retained, because a migration often breaks the link between old loads and the emails and invoices around them. If you migrated but kept the old database, that archive may still count.
How many brokerages fit, for context
The Census Bureau's 2022 business counts show 1,837 firms in freight transportation arrangement (NAICS 488510) with 20 to 499 employees, and another 1,575 with 10 to 19 (source: Census, Statistics of US Businesses 2022). On authority age, our count from FMCSA's public authority history on October 15, 2026 found about 19,600 property-broker grants with no recorded disposition, of which about 5,967 were granted before 2016 and 11,081 in 2020 or later (source: FMCSA AuthHist dataset, DOT data hub). “No recorded disposition” is our stand-in for still active, so treat these as estimates. The point is simple: a brokerage with ten years of authority and 20+ desk staff is in a fairly small group. The freight and logistics page shows how Regulr reviews a brokerage of that size.
What buyers advertise paying for logistics company data
No buyer publishes a price for freight data specifically. What exists are each program's general ranges, which you can see in the table above. A few that matter for a brokerage:
- Scale AI: “$10K to $1M+” as an illustrative value per partnership, scaling with cadence, and it says partnerships are designed for recurring revenue (source: Scale AI, data partnerships).
- Polyshares: $100K to $2M+, and its track-record page shows four closed deals of $110K to $450K, each a perpetual exclusive license (source: Polyshares, Polyshares, track record).
- micro1: $100K+ for a qualified partnership, $500K+ for large datasets, $1M+ for highly unique data (source: micro1, data partnerships).
- Mode, which accepts brokerages on size: indicative offers of $200K to $500K for 20 to 49 US staff, $400K to $900K for 50 to 149, and $800K+ for 150+ in its affiliate FAQ (source: Mode affiliate FAQ (Oct 14, 2026)).
Treat estimators with care. Pewter's example for a 100-person, 10-year firm ($385K to $895K) and Handshake AI's ($383,083 to $896,969) are nearly identical (source: Pewter, Handshake AI, data partnerships), so they are not independent valuations. What actually moves a brokerage's price is years on one TMS, records that link by load number, outcomes in the data, and how much has to be excluded. Our data value checker walks through those factors.
What usually stays out of a freight data license
Freight has more third-party data inside its systems than most industries. That is the main thing to sort out before you talk to buyers. Here is what vendor terms and common contracts say, in summary. Our guide to DAT, Truckstop and vendor data in a freight data license goes vendor by vendor.
- DAT data. DAT's terms (§5.2.3) prohibit using its products or product data “to train or otherwise improve any publicly available” AI or machine learning algorithm, and §9 calls the freight rates in its product data “the trade secrets of DAT” (source: DAT terms and conditions). That covers load-board posts and rate benchmarks, including values pasted into quotes.
- Truckstop and RMIS data. Truckstop's terms (§11) say “You will not input any Truckstop Data into any AI Function for any purpose, including training” without its written consent, and its RMIS terms say customer data does not include Truckstop data, including carrier information (source: Truckstop terms and conditions).
- Vetting, rate-prediction and tracking outputs. Highway's terms (§5) prohibit redistributing its content (source: Highway terms of service). Triumph's terms, which cover Greenscreens, bar using service outputs to train or benchmark an AI model (§7) (source: Triumph terms of service). project44's public terms (§4.2) restrict passing the shipment data covered by the agreement to any third party while the data obligation runs (source: project44 terms).
- Rates under shipper NDAs. Shipper agreements and RFP packages often treat rates and volumes as confidential. Troveo's guide excludes “Carrier and supplier rates you agreed to keep confidential” (source: Troveo, logistics data licensing guide (Oct 13, 2026)).
- Rate confirmation clauses. Broker-carrier agreements commonly include confidentiality terms, a point raised at FMCSA's broker transparency hearing (source: FreightWaves, broker transparency hearing). Rate cons are usually reviewed line by line or left out.
- W-9s, bank letters and factoring data. Carrier tax IDs and bank details are not training data. Buyers exclude them.
- Records under legal hold. Anything tied to a pending claim suit, a broker-liability case or a fraud investigation stays out.
- Driver personal data. Driver names, cell numbers, precise locations and truck numbers are removed or replaced with tokens. Records that are mostly about drivers, such as hours-of-service logs, are a poor fit.
None of this empties the dataset. Strip the vendor fields and the NDA-bound rates, and what remains (your quotes, check calls, exceptions, claims, carrier threads and SOPs) is the part buyers say they want. You approve the scope, and each exclusion is named in the contract.
Licensing TMS data to AI: what your software says
Your TMS is where the value sits, so its contract matters. The TMS terms we have read mostly say the broker owns its records, with two common caveats: fields the software itself generates, and short export windows after the contract ends.
- Descartes, which sells Aljex, says in its master terms that it claims no ownership of customer data (§6.5), but retains all rights to “Application Data” its products generate and bars giving that data to third parties (§6.3) (source: Descartes master terms DSG26.0). Descartes also bought Tai Software in August 2026 (source: Descartes, acquisition of Tai Software), so check which terms your Tai contract now follows.
- Rose Rocket's terms say the customer owns its customer data (§4.2) and make it available for retrieval for 30 days after the contract ends (§7.2) (source: Rose Rocket terms).
- McLeod contracts are signed offline, and self-hosted McLeod keeps the database on your own servers. Turvo and Revenova have their own terms; your signed contract is what governs.
Our guide to exporting your history from McLeod, Aljex, Tai, Turvo and Revenova covers what each system stores, what the terms say about ownership, and what to export before a license or a contract change.
If you are selling your freight brokerage
Brokerages are changing hands. Capstone Partners counted private equity sponsors in 23 of 48 3PL deals in 2026 through late June (source: Capstone Partners, 3PL market update (Jun 29, 2026)). If a sale is on your horizon, a data license is one more contract a buyer of your company will read in diligence. Exclusivity is the term to watch: Labelbox Prism is exclusive by default (source: Labelbox Prism), Polyshares' published deals are perpetual exclusive licenses (source: Polyshares, track record), and Mode's affiliate FAQ describes 24 months of seller exclusivity (source: Mode affiliate FAQ (Oct 14, 2026)).
Licensing before a sale can turn an archive into cash the acquirer does not pay you for. Licensing after a sale usually means the records belong to the new owner. Our guide to licensing records before selling a freight brokerage covers the timing and the questions an acquirer will ask.
If you are closing your freight brokerage
A closed brokerage can still license its records, as long as the records still exist. Pewter accepts closed firms with 20+ staff at peak (source: Pewter), micro1 runs a separate form for closed companies with 50+ employees at peak (source: micro1 defunct-company form), and Ooak Data accepts closed companies, with a liquidator or administrator able to sign (source: Ooak Data, partner).
The clock is the problem. Hosted software stops being yours to export soon after the contract ends: Rose Rocket's window is 30 days, for example (source: Rose Rocket terms). Export first, then cancel. Our guide to what a closing freight brokerage's records are still worth lists the buyers that take closed brokers and the deadlines to watch.
How a freight data deal runs, step by step
- Inventory. List your systems (TMS, email, phone system, accounting, CRM, chat, shared drives), how many years each holds, and roughly how many loads a year you move. Nothing leaves your systems at this stage.
- Scope. Decide what is in and what is out. Vendor fields, NDA-bound rates, W-9s and bank data, and anything under legal hold are the usual exclusions. You approve the scope, and it is written into the contract.
- De-identification. Shipper names, carrier names, MC and DOT numbers, driver names and phones, and owner-operator identities are masked or replaced with consistent tokens, so a load still links end to end without naming anyone. Polyshares says a specialist PII partner strips identifying fields before it or any lab sees the records (source: Polyshares). micro1 says it removes personal information and may synthetically rewrite datasets (source: micro1 operating-company form).
- Offers. Buyers review a sample or a description and make an offer. Polyshares says it makes an offer within one to two weeks of intake (source: Polyshares); Labelbox Prism promises a quote within 48 hours (source: Labelbox Prism).
- Terms. Price, payment schedule, exact scope, exclusivity, permitted uses, deletion at the end of the term, and the warranties you give about your rights to the records.
- Delivery. The records go from your systems to the buyer you chose. With Regulr, they never pass through us.
- Payment. Timing varies widely. Mercor pays by wire on delivery, typically 2 to 4 weeks after signing (source: Mercor, Monetize your data). Labelbox Prism advertises a first payment in under 21 days (source: Labelbox Prism). Polyshares pays net 30 to 60 days after the data is approved (source: Polyshares). Mode's site expects about three months from first conversation to payment (source: Mode, data program). Appen pays on acceptance rather than submission (source: Appen, enterprise data). micro1 does not publish a seller timeline (source: micro1, data partnerships).
The best position is more than one written offer, because buyers price the same records differently and their terms differ even more. That comparison is the work Regulr does for the seller. If you want to see how your brokerage would come out, start with the freight and logistics page and see what your brokerage's records could qualify for.
How Regulr is paid, and how we write these pages
Regulr is a sell-side advisor. When a business we introduce signs a license, we may be paid a fee by the buyer or through a program's referral terms. We list every program we can verify whether or not it pays us, order is never set by fees, and every figure is the company's own advertised term with a link to where it says so. Regulr has not closed a data deal yet, so nothing here describes our results.
Frequently asked questions
Can a freight broker sell its data to AI companies?
Yes, several AI training-data companies license de-identified copies of brokerage records, and some name the category outright: Scale AI lists Freight Brokerage & 3PL, and Pewter puts logistics among its strongest demand. What a deal covers is the records your own team created, such as quotes, carrier threads, check calls, exceptions and claims. Data from DAT, Truckstop, vetting services and visibility platforms usually stays out because those vendors' terms restrict it. You license a copy and keep your originals.
How much is a freight brokerage's data worth?
No buyer publishes a freight-specific price. The programs that name freight or logistics advertise broad ranges, such as Scale AI's $10K to $1M+ per partnership and Polyshares' $100K to $2M+. What moves the number is years of history on one TMS, records that link from quote to invoice by load number, and how much has to be excluded. Advertised ranges are not offers, and only a written offer tells you what a buyer will pay for your records.
Will my shippers or carriers find out I licensed my data?
Buyers license records with shipper names, carrier names, MC numbers and driver details masked or replaced with consistent tokens, so the dataset is not meant to point back to any one customer or carrier. That is not a guarantee: a small shipper base or an unusual lane can make a record easier to trace. Agree in writing on what is excluded entirely, that the buyer will not try to re-identify anyone, and whether your company's name stays confidential.
Can I include DAT or Truckstop data in a data license?
Their terms say no. DAT's terms prohibit using its products or product data to train publicly available AI, and call the freight rates in its data DAT trade secrets. Truckstop's terms say customers will not input any Truckstop Data into an AI function for any purpose, including training, without written consent. Buyers typically ask for DAT and Truckstop fields to be stripped from TMS exports before delivery.
How many employees does a freight brokerage need to qualify?
Most programs start at about 20 full-time staff. Mode asks for 20+ full-time US office employees, Handshake AI and Pewter ask for 20+ full-time staff with 3+ years of records, micro1 asks for 30+, and Scale AI calls 40+ its preferred starting point. Polyshares, HUMXN and Anthroly publish no headcount minimum. A brokerage with 10 to 19 people has fewer routes but is not shut out.
Do truck drivers count toward headcount for AI data programs?
In a pure brokerage the drivers work for the carriers you hire, not for you, so they are not on your payroll to count. What counts is the desk team: carrier sales, customer sales, operations, track and trace, and accounting. Mode counts only office employees. If you run an asset-based carrier with a brokerage division, ask each buyer how it counts drivers before you rely on a headcount gate.
Which TMS data do AI buyers want from a brokerage?
The records your team typed or decided: quotes with won or lost outcomes, load records, check calls, exception and accessorial notes, claims, carrier approval decisions, and invoicing and payables history. They are most valuable when one load number ties the quote, the tender, the check calls and the invoice together. Fields your TMS computed or pulled from a vendor, such as rate benchmarks or vetting scores, are the parts most often stripped.
Do I lose my records or my TMS history if I license it?
No. A data license gives the buyer a de-identified copy for an agreed use and term. Your TMS, email and accounting history stay where they are, and you keep running the business on them. The license terms decide what the buyer may do with the copy, whether it is exclusive, and whether it must be deleted at the end.
Sources
Program terms, vendor terms and 49 CFR 371.3 checked against their own pages on October 15, 2026. FMCSA and Census counts computed from the public datasets the same day.
- Scale AI, data partnerships
- Pewter
- Pewter partners
- micro1, data partnerships
- micro1 operating-company form
- micro1 defunct-company form
- Mercor, Monetize your data
- HUMXN partners
- Endless
- Polyshares
- Polyshares, track record
- Anthroly
- Sureform
- Sureform, estimate
- Labelbox Prism
- Troveo, business data
- Troveo, logistics data licensing guide (Oct 13, 2026)
- Mode, data program
- Mode affiliate FAQ (Oct 14, 2026)
- Handshake AI, data partnerships
- Handshake AI, license your data
- Replay, referrals
- Appen, enterprise data
- Ooak Data, partner
- DAT terms and conditions
- Truckstop terms and conditions
- Triumph terms of service
- Highway terms of service
- project44 terms
- Descartes master terms DSG26.0
- Descartes, acquisition of Tai Software
- Rose Rocket terms
- 49 CFR 371.3 (Cornell LII)
- FMCSA AuthHist dataset, DOT data hub
- Census, Statistics of US Businesses 2022
- Capstone Partners, 3PL market update (Jun 29, 2026)
- FreightWaves, broker transparency hearing
Brian Boesen · Founder, Regulr AI
Brian runs Regulr AI, which works for established businesses that want to license de-identified records to AI companies. He checks each program's published terms against its own pages and updates these guides when they change. Last updated October 15, 2026.
This page is general information, not legal advice, and Regulr is not a law firm. Rules vary by state, by profession and by contract, and they apply to your facts, not to a category. You approve exactly what is in scope before anything is shared.
Keep reading